更新时间:2023-10-06 18:07:16
您不能.从技术上讲,它也没有多大意义.您可能正在为特定功能需求寻找错误方向的解决方案.
You can't. It technically also doesn't make much sense. You're probably looking for a solution in the wrong direction for the particular functional requirement.
您***的选择是拥有一个父bean,并将那些多个bean"作为孩子.
Your best bet is to have a parent bean and have those "multiple beans" as children.
@ManagedBean
@RequestScoped
public class Parent {
private Child child1;
private Child child2;
// ...
}
,以便您可以通过#{parent.child1}
和#{parent.child2}
访问它.当然,您也可以使用List<Child>
属性,甚至使用Map<String, Child>
来提高灵活性.
so that you can access it by #{parent.child1}
and #{parent.child2}
. You can of course also use a List<Child>
property or even Map<String, Child>
instead to be more flexible.
使用faces-config.xml
可以定义多个具有不同名称的bean类.尽管如此,我仍然看不到它的用处.
With the faces-config.xml
it's however possible to define multiple bean classes with a different name. Still then, I don't see how that's useful.