且构网

分享程序员开发的那些事...
且构网 - 分享程序员编程开发的那些事

不一致Equals和GetHash code方法

更新时间:2023-02-01 21:39:59

您的问题是,你错过了 i.Equals(J)的隐式转换。它进入到超载 int.Equals(INT)。在这里,我们比较(INT)Ĵ,这是同样的事情。同样的隐式转换会发生在​​ ==

其他的比较上工作的 INT 为sbyte ,它通过定义不同。 j.Equals(我)进入过载 int.Equals(对象),因为参数不是隐转换为为sbyte

等于是对称的他们,但是你的电话code不是。如果你想喝preSS隐式转换为 i.Equals((对象)j)条,它会返回,显示等于的确是对称的。

After reading this question Why do "int" and "sbyte" GetHashCode functions generate different values? I wanted to dig further and found following behavior:

sbyte i = 1;            
int j = 1;
object.Equals(i, j) //false (1)
object.Equals(j, i) //false (2) 
i.Equals(j) //false (3)
j.Equals(i) //true (4)
i == j //true (5)
j == i //true (6)
i.GetHashCode() == j.GetHashCode() //false (7)

  1. Difference between (3) and (4) breaks the requirement that Equals should be symmetric.
  2. Difference between (2) and (4) is not coherent with MSDN specification that says:

    If the two objects do not represent the same object reference and neither is null, it calls objA.Equals(objB) and returns the result. This means that if objA overrides the Object.Equals(Object) method, this override is called.

  3. Difference between (3) and (5) means that operator == returns true, however objects are not equal in terms of Equals.
  4. Difference between (4), (5), (6) and (7) means that two objects are equal in terms of operator == and Equals, however they have different hash codes.

I'm very interested if anyone can explain why such in my opinion inconsistent behaviour is observed in rather fundamental .NET types.

Your problem is that you missed the implicit conversion in i.Equals(j). It goes to the overload int.Equals(int). Here you're comparing i and (int)j, which are the same thing. The same implicit conversion happens for ==.

The other comparisons work on an int and a sbyte, which by definition are different. j.Equals(i) goes to the overload int.Equals(object), because the argument isn't implicitly convertible to sbyte.

Equals is symmetric for them, but your calling code isn't. If you suppress the implicit conversion with i.Equals((object)j), it'll return false, showing that Equals is indeed symmetric.