泛型版本继承的接口的泛型版本，这会像往常一样强制实现类。

  interface ITypeSerializer {} 
接口ITypeSerializer< T> ：ITypeSerializer {} $ b $ class StringSerializer：ITypeSerializer< string> {} //实现ITypeSerializer，也是

 //非泛型数组
 ITypeSerializer [] serializers = ... 
 $ p $ > 

在 ITypeSerializer 上需要的任何方法应接受或返回 object ，实现通常是通用版本的传递方法。 
 

一个实现示例：

  public interface ITypeSerializer 
 {
 void Write（BinaryWriter writer，object obj）; 
对象读取（BinaryReader reader）; 
} 

 public interface ITypeSerializer< T> ：ITypeSerializer 
 {
 void Write（BinaryWriter writer，T obj）; 
 T读取（BinaryReader reader）; 
} 
 
当您执行 ITypeSerializer< T> $ c>，您还需要为 ITypeSerializer 方法提供实现。一个常见的模式是隐式地实现泛型和非泛型泛型，这样非泛型方法仅在通过接口引用类时才可见。
  class StringSerializer：ITypeSerializer< string> 
 {
 // ITypeSerializer的隐式实现< string> 
 public void Write（BinaryWriter writer，string obj）
 {
 //在这里提供核心实现
} 

 public string Read（BinaryReader reader）
 {
 //在这里提供核心实现
} 

 // ITypeSerializer的显式实现
 void ITypeSerializer.Write（BinaryWriter writer，object obj）
 {
 if（！（obj is string））throw new ArgumentException（obj）; 

 this.Write（writer，（string）obj）; 


 object ITypeSerializer.Read（BinaryReader reader）
 {
 return this.Read（reader）; 


 
请注意非泛型方法是如何传递给/来自通用同行。
 
I am a Java guy, and trying to implement some code in C#. I did a research for an hour but couldn't find any. 
I have an interface that I declared as Generic called 
interface TypeSerializer<T>
Then I have two implementation of this. 
class StringSerializer: TypeSerializer<String> 
and
class ByteArraySerializer: TypeSerializer<byte[]> 
Now I want to create an array with these instances and refer to array as TypeSerializer. Sth like this:
TypeSerializer[] serializers = 
new TypeSerializer[2] {new ByteArraySerializer(), new StringSerializer()};
This code doesn't compile, however in Java a similar code does compile. 

I also tried sth 
TypeSerializer<Object>[] serializers = 
new TypeSerializer<Object>[2] {new ByteArraySerializer(), new StringSerializer()};
still no way. 

How should I declare this array and reach to the instances without knowing the Generic Type. 

EDIT

Based on the answers below it becomes clear that I should have two interfaces; with and without generic. 
Here is the Interface methods. Could you please show also how to implement them. 
public interface ITypeSerializer<T>:TypeSerializer
{
    void write(BinaryWriter writer, T obj);
    T read(BinaryReader reader);
}

You can create a non-generic version of the interface that the generic version inherits, which forces the implementations to the classes as usual.
interface ITypeSerializer { }
interface ITypeSerializer<T> : ITypeSerializer { }
class StringSerializer : ITypeSerializer<string> { } // implements ITypeSerializer, too 

// non-generic array
ITypeSerializer[] serializers = ...
Any method that you need on ITypeSerializer should either accept or return object, with the implementations typically being pass-through methods for the generic versions. 

An implementation example:
public interface ITypeSerializer
{
    void Write(BinaryWriter writer, object obj);
    object Read(BinaryReader reader);
}

public interface ITypeSerializer<T> : ITypeSerializer
{
    void Write(BinaryWriter writer, T obj); 
    T Read(BinaryReader reader);
}
When you implement ITypeSerializer<T>, you also need to provide implementations for the ITypeSerializer methods. A common pattern is to implement the generic implicitly and the non-generic explicitly, so that the non-generic methods are only visible when referring to the class via the interface.
class StringSerializer : ITypeSerializer<string>
{
    // implicit implementation of ITypeSerializer<string>
    public void Write(BinaryWriter writer, string obj)
    {
        // provide core implementation here
    }

    public string Read(BinaryReader reader)
    {
        // provide core implementation here
    }

    // explicit implementation of ITypeSerializer
    void ITypeSerializer.Write(BinaryWriter writer, object obj)
    {
        if (!(obj is string)) throw new ArgumentException("obj");

        this.Write(writer, (string)obj);
    }

    object ITypeSerializer.Read(BinaryReader reader)
    {
        return this.Read(reader);
    }
}
Notice how the non-generic methods are simply passing to/from the generic counterparts.