你可以尝试一套，但你需要声明自己的元组，使其工作。

You could try it with a set, but you need to declare your own tuple class to make it work.

case class MyTuple[A](t: (A, A)) {
  override def hashCode = t._1.hashCode + t._2.hashCode
  override def equals(other: Any) = other match {
    case MyTuple((a, b)) => a.equals(t._1) && b.equals(t._2) || a.equals(t._2) && b.equals(t._1)
    case _ => false
  }
}

val input= List(("A","B"), 
                ("C","B"), 
                ("B","A"))

val output = input.map(MyTuple.apply).toSet.toList.map((mt: MyTuple[String]) => mt.t)
println(output)

编辑：
Travis的答案让我意识到有一个更好的方法来做到这一点。这就是通过编写一个distinctBy方法来模拟sortBy。

edit: Travis's answer made me realise that there is a nicer way to do this. And that is by writing a distinctBy method that works analog to sortBy.

implicit class extList[T](list: List[T]) {
  def distinctBy[U](f: T => U): List[T] = {
    var set = Set.empty[U]
    var result = List.empty[T]
    for(t <- list) {
      val u = f(t)
      if(!set(u)) {
        result ::= t
        set += u
      }
    }
    result.reverse
  }
}

println(input.distinctBy { case (a, b) => Set((a,b), (b,a)) })