更新时间:2023-02-23 13:34:47
如果我理解正确,那么您真正需要做的就是也将两者之间的任意数量的空格匹配,例如:
If I understand you right, all you need to do really is also match any number of spaces between the two as well, for example:
/\[([^]]*)\] *\(([^)]*)\)/i
说明:
\[ # Matches the opening square bracket (escaped)
([^]]*) # Captures any number of characters that aren't close square brackets
\] # Match close square bracket (escaped)
* # Match any number of spaces
\( # Match the opening bracket (escaped)
([^)]*) # Captures any number of characters that aren't close brackets
\) # Match the close bracket (escaped)
辩护:
我可能应该证明我将您的.*?
更改为[^]]*
I should probably justify that the reason I changed your .*?
into [^]]*
第二个版本效率更高,因为它不需要像.*?
那样进行大量的回溯.另外,一旦遇到[
开头,.*?
版本将继续查找直到找到匹配项,而不是如果它不是我们想要的标记,则会失败.例如,如果我们使用.*?
与以下表达式匹配
The second version is more efficient because it doesn't need to do a huge amount of backtracking that .*?
does. Additionally, once an opening [
is encountered, the .*?
version will carry on looking until it finds a match, rather than failing if it is not a tag as we would want. For example, if we match the expression using .*?
against:
Sad face :[ blah [LINK1](http://sub.example.com/) blah
它将匹配
[ blah [LINK1]
和
http://sub.example.com/
使用[^]]*
方法将意味着输入正确匹配.
Using the [^]]*
approach will mean that the input is matched correctly.