你真的试过这段代码了吗?它在 gcc 上运行良好，只需稍作调整 std::vector::const_iterator，需要声明为 typename std::vector::const_iterator

Did you actually try this code? It works fine on gcc with a small tweak std::vector<T>::const_iterator, needs to be declared as typename std::vector<T>::const_iterator

使用 std::copy 和 std::ostream_iterator 可能会更好.

You may be better off with using std::copy and std::ostream_iterator.

类型、依赖类型和类型名称不能在评论中全部放完，所以这里是(顺便说一句.这是我的理解，我可能会离开一英里 - 如果是这样，请纠正我！)...

types, dependent types and typename Can't fit it all in the comments, so here goes (btw. this is my understanding and I could be off by a country mile - if so please correct me!)...

我认为这***用一个简单的例子来解释..

I think this is best explained with a simple example..

假设你有一个函数 foo

Let's assume you have a function foo

template <typename T>
void foo()
{
  T::bob * instofbob; // this is a dependent name (i.e. bob depends on T)
};

看起来不错，通常你可以这样做

Looks okay, and typically you may do this

class SimpleClass
{
  typedef int bob;
};

然后打电话

foo<SimpleClass>(); // now we know that foo::instofbob is "int"

再次，似乎不言自明，但是一些 nuser 出现并执行此操作

Again, seems self explanatory, however some nuser comes along and does this

class IdiotClass
{
  static int bob;
};

现在

foo<IdiotClass>(); // oops, 

您现在拥有的是一个表达式(乘法)，因为 IdiotClass::bob 解析为非类型！

What you have now is an expression (multiplication) as IdiotClass::bob resolves to a non-type!

对于人类来说，这很明显是愚蠢的，但是编译器无法区分类型与非类型，默认情况下在 C++ 中(我认为这是编译器的不同之处)，所有 限定的依赖名称(即 T::bob)将被视为非类型.要显式告诉编译器依赖名称是真实类型，您必须指定typename关键字 -

To the human, it's obvious that this is stupid, but the compiler has no way of differentiating between types vs. non-types, and by default in C++ (and I think this is where compilers differ), all qualified dependent names (i.e. T::bob) will be treated as non-type. To explicitly tell the compiler that the dependent name is a real type, you must specify the typename keyword -

template <typename T>
void foo()
{
  typedef typename T::bob *instofbob; // now compiler is happy, it knows to interpret "bob" as a type (and will complain otherwise!)
};

即使它是 typedef，这也适用.即

This applies even if it is a typedef. i.e.

template <typename T>
void foo()
{
  typedef typename T::bob local_bob;
};

这样更清楚吗?