拿走var关闭 var termcounter = rs（0）;

你可能正确地提升 - JavaScript没有块范围，因此两次声明termcounter它都在同一范围内。这是一个非常常见的错误，因为JavaScript看起来像具有块范围的基于C的语言。

You're probably right about hoisting--JavaScript doesn't have block scope, so both times you declare termcounter it's in the same scope. This is a very common mistake, since JavaScript looks like C-based languages which have block scope.

声明条件或循环块中的var等同于声明它块的功能的开头，范围方式。

Declaring a var in a conditional or looping block is equivalent to declaring it at the beginning of the function that block is in, scope-wise.

如果你总是将var声明放在函数的顶部，你将失去更少的头发 - 永远不会在条件或循环块中。 查看Crockford 。您可以使用 JSLint 向您发出警告。 （哦，顺便说一句，你丢失了大量的分号 - JSLint会伤害你的感情。）

You'll lose less hair if you always place your var declarations at the top of functions--never in conditional or loop blocks. See Crockford. You can use JSLint to warn you. (Oh, by the way, you're missing a ton of semicolons--JSLint will hurt your feelings.)

那你为什么要重新声明呢？删除第二个var并进行分配。

So why are you redeclaring it? Drop the second "var" and just do the assignment.

微软的东西对我来说很陌生，但我发现rs（0）语法莫名其妙。是一个对象吗？或者是否有某种神奇使它成为一个函数（你从来不知道JS）？ 我做了一些谷歌搜索，我想知道你是否需要成为使用rs.fields（0）或rs.fields（0）.name或rs.fields（0）.value或其他东西。

The Microsoft stuff is alien to me, but I find the rs(0) syntax baffling. Is rs an object? Or is there some kind of magic that makes it into a function as well (you never know with JS)? I did some Googling and I wonder if you need to be using rs.fields(0) or rs.fields(0).name or rs.fields(0).value or something.