且构网

分享程序员开发的那些事...
且构网 - 分享程序员编程开发的那些事

Git svn clone:是否可以在错误后恢复XML格式错误:找不到元素?

更新时间:2023-11-22 17:27:22

git-svn 不是一次性转换存储库或存储库零件的正确工具.如果要将Git用作现有SVN服务器的前端,这是一个很好的工具,但是对于一次性转换,您应该使用 git-svn ,而> svn2git ,它更适合此用例.

git-svn is not the right tool for one-time conversions of repositories or repository parts. It is a great tool if you want to use Git as frontend for an existing SVN server, but for one-time conversions you should not use git-svn, but svn2git which is much more suited for this use-case.

有一些名为 svn2git 的工具,可能***的工具是 https://github.com/svn-all-fast-export/svn2git .我强烈建议使用该 svn2git 工具.这是我所知道的***的,它在处理规则文件方面非常灵活.

There are pleny tools called svn2git, the probably best one is the KDE one from https://github.com/svn-all-fast-export/svn2git. I strongly recommend using that svn2git tool. It is the best I know available out there and it is very flexible in what you can do with its rules files.

如果您不是100%知道存储库的历史,请从 http://blog.hartwork.org/?p=763 是一个很好的工具,可以在将SVN信息库迁移到Git时对其进行调查.

If you are not 100% about the history of your repository, svneverever from http://blog.hartwork.org/?p=763 is a great tool to investigate the history of an SVN repository when migrating it to Git.

尽管git-svn较容易入门,但还有一些其他原因为什么除了灵活性之外,使用KDE svn2git 代替 git-svn 更为优越:

Even though git-svn is easier to start with, here are some further reasons why using the KDE svn2git instead of git-svn is superior, besides its flexibility:

  • 通过 svn2git (如果使用了正确的历史记录)可以更好,更清晰地重建历史记录,对于具有分支和合并等更复杂历史记录的情况尤其如此.
  • 标签是真实标签,不是Git中的分支
  • 带有 git-svn 的标签包含一个额外的空提交,这也使它们不属于分支,因此常规的 fetch 直到您给出-tags 到命令,默认情况下,也仅获取指向获取的分支的标记.带有正确的svn2git标签是它们所属的地方
  • 如果您在SVN中更改了布局,则可以轻松地使用 svn2git 进行配置,而使用 git-svn 最终会放弃历史记录
  • 使用 svn2git ,您还可以轻松地将一个SVN存储库拆分为多个Git存储库
  • 或将同一SVN根目录中的多个SVN存储库轻松组合到一个Git存储库中
  • 使用正确的 svn2git 进行的转换比使用 git-svn
  • 的转换快了数百万亿倍
  • the history is rebuilt much better and cleaner by svn2git (if the correct one is used), this is especially the case for more complex histories with branches and merges and so on
  • the tags are real tags and not branches in Git
  • with git-svn the tags contain an extra empty commit which also makes them not part of the branches, so a normal fetch will not get them until you give --tags to the command as by default only tags pointing to fetched branches are fetched also. With the proper svn2git tags are where they belong
  • if you changed layout in SVN you can easily configure this with svn2git, with git-svn you will loose history eventually
  • with svn2git you can also split one SVN repository into multiple Git repositories easily
  • or combine multiple SVN repositories in the same SVN root into one Git repository easily
  • the conversion is a gazillion times faster with the correct svn2git than with git-svn

git-svn 较差,而KDE svn2git 较优的原因有很多.:-)

There are many reasons why git-svn is worse and the KDE svn2git is superior. :-)