分享程序员开发的那些事...
更新时间：2023-11-27 21:51:52
根据您的描述，我建议使用如
使得令牌已经在您的服务器上，并且不需要从客户端传递。如果您使用非加密连接，这可能是安全风险（例如中间人攻击）。
步骤（1）记录
中的人你需要在范围参数中指定要从用户收集的权限。该请求只能通过正常链接触发：
GET https://www.facebook.com/dialog/oauth？
client_id = {app-id}
& redirect_uri = {redirect-uri}
& response_type = code
& scope = {permission_list}
请参阅
（2）确认身份
GET https://graph.facebook.com/oauth/access_token？
client_id = {app-id}
& redirect_uri = {redirect-uri}
& client_secret = {app-secret}
& code = {code-parameter}
（3）检查访问令牌
您可以通过
GET / debug_token？input_token = {token-to-inspect}
& access_token = {app-token-or-admin-token}
这只应该在服务器端完成，否则你会让你的应用访问令牌对最终用户可见（不是一个好主意！）。
请参阅
（4）扩展访问令牌
一旦获得（短命令）令牌，您可以执行按照
如下：
GET / oauth / access_token？grant_type = fb_exchange_token
& client_id = {app-id}
& client_secret = {app-secret}
& fb_exchange_token = {short-lived-token}
（5）存储访问令牌
关于在服务器，FB建议这样做：
（6）处理过期的访问令牌
作为FB如果令牌已过期（如果您未保存到期日期并在进行呼叫之前将其与当前时间戳进行比较），则不通知您），如果令牌无效，则可能会从FB接收到错误消息（之后）最大。 60天）。错误代码将为 190 ：
{
错误：{
message：验证访问令牌时出错：会话已过期在unix
时间SOME_TIME。当前unix时间为SOME_TIME。，
type：OAuthException ，
code：190
}
}
如果访问令牌变得无效，解决方案是让用户重新登录，此时您将能够再次进行API调用。您的应用程序用于新用户的登录流程应确定您需要采用哪种方法。
I'm developing several web services and a handful of clients (web app, mobile, etc.) which will interface with said services over HTTP(s). My current work item is to design an authentication and authorization solution for the product. I have decided to leverage external identity providers, such as Facebook, Google, Microsoft, Twitter, and the like for authentication.
I'm trying to solve the problem of, "when a request comes to my server, how do I know who the user is and how can I be sure?". More questions below as well...
The system should use token based authentication (as opposed to cookies for example or basic auth).
I believe this is the right choice for scaling across multiple clients and servers while providing loose coupling.
Based on my reading and understanding of token based authentication, the following is how I imagine the workflow to be. Let's focus for now on Facebook in a web browser. My assumption is that other external identity providers should have similar capabilities, though I have not confirmed just yet.
Note, as of writing, I'm basing the following off of Facebook login version 2.2
I’m imagining steps 5-9 would be repeated for subsequent requests to the server (while the user’s access token is valid – not expired, revoked from FB side, app permissions changed, etc.)
Here's a diagram to help go along with the steps. Please understand this system is not a single page application (SPA). The web services mentioned are API endpoints serving JSON data back to clients essentially; they are not serving HTML/JS/CSS (with the exception of the web client servers).
First and foremost, are there any glaring gaps / pit falls with the described approach based on my preface and requirements?
Is performing an outbound request to Facebook for verifying the access token (steps 6-8 above) per client request required / recommended?
I know in the very least, I must verify the access token coming from client request. However, the recommended approach for subsequent verifications after the first is unknown to me. If there are typical patterns, I’m interested in hearing about them. I understand they may be application dependent based on my requirements; however, I just don’t know what to look for yet. I’ll put in the due diligence once I have a basic idea.
For instance, possible thoughts:
Hash the access token + userId pair after first verification is complete and store it in a distributed cache (accessible by all web servers) with expiry equal to access token’s. Upon subsequent requests from the clients, hash the access token + userId pair and check its existence in the cache. If present, then request is authorized. Otherwise, reach out to Facebook graph API to confirm the access token. I’m assuming this strategy might be feasible if I’m using HTTPS (which I will be). However, how does performance compare?
The accepted answer in this *** question recommends creating a custom access token after the first verification of the Facebook user token is complete. The custom token would then be sent to the client for subsequent requests. I’m wondering if this is more complex than the above solution, however. This would require implementing my own Identity Provider (something I want to avoid because I want to use external identity providers in the first place…). Is there any merit to this suggestion?
Is the signedRequest field present on the response in step #3 above (mentioned here), equivalent to the signed request parameter here in the ‘games canvas login’ flow?
They seem to be hinted as equivalent since the former links to the latter in the documentation. However, I’m surprised the verification strategy mentioned on the games page isn’t mentioned in the ‘manually building a login flow’ page of the web documentation.
If the answer to #3 is ‘Yes’, can the same identity confirmation strategy of decoding the signature and comparing to what is expected be used on the server-side?
I’m wondering if this can be leveraged instead of making an outbound call to the debug_token graph API (step #6 above) to confirm the access token as recommended here:
Of course, in order to make the comparison on the server-side, the signed request portion would need to be sent along with the request to the server (step #5 above). In addition to feasibility without sacrificing security, I’m wondering how the performance would compare to making the outbound call.
While I’m at it, in what scenario / for what purpose, would you persist a user's access token to a database for example? I don’t see a scenario where I would need to do this, however, I may be overlooking something. I’m curious was some common scenarios might be to spark some thoughts.
Thanks!
From what you describe I'd suggest to use a server-side login flow as described in
so that the token is already on your server, and doesn't need to be passed from the client. If you're using non-encrypted connections, this could be a security risk (e.g. for man-in-the-middle attacks).
The steps would be:
(1) Logging people in
You need to specify the permission you want to gather from the users in the scope parameter. The request can be triggered just via a normal link:
GET https://www.facebook.com/dialog/oauth?
client_id={app-id}
&redirect_uri={redirect-uri}
&response_type=code
&scope={permission_list}
See
(2) Confirm the identitity
GET https://graph.facebook.com/oauth/access_token?
client_id={app-id}
&redirect_uri={redirect-uri}
&client_secret={app-secret}
&code={code-parameter}
(3) Inspect the access token
You can inspect the token as you already said in your question via
GET /debug_token?input_token={token-to-inspect}
&access_token={app-token-or-admin-token}
This should only be done server-side, because otherwise you'd make you app access token visible to end users (not a good idea!).
See
(4) Extending the access token
Once you got the (short-lived) token, you can do a call to extend the token as described in
like the following:
GET /oauth/access_token?grant_type=fb_exchange_token
&client_id={app-id}
&client_secret={app-secret}
&fb_exchange_token={short-lived-token}
(5) Storing of access tokens
Concerning the storing of the tokens on the server, FB suggests to do so:
(6) Handling expired access tokens
As FB doesn't notify you if a token has expired (and if you don't save the expiry date and compare this to the current timestamp before making a call), it's possible that you receive error messages from FB if the token got invalid (after max. 60 days). The error code will be 190:
{
"error": {
"message": "Error validating access token: Session has expired at unix
time SOME_TIME. The current unix time is SOME_TIME.",
"type": "OAuthException",
"code": 190
}
}
See
If the access token becomes invalid, the solution is to have the person log in again, at which point you will be able to make API calls on their behalf once more. The login flow your app uses for new people should determine which method you need to adopt.