且构网

分享程序员开发的那些事...
且构网 - 分享程序员编程开发的那些事

LOB是否使用HADR进行了重新审核?

更新时间:2023-12-01 11:05:22

m0 **** @ yahoo.com 写道:
我试图确定是否使用HADR对LOB进行了重新编译。
以下来自在线手册的文档
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infoce...help/index.jsp 表明
LOB'不会在HADR上复制:
- ----------------------------------------------
... -
NOT LOGGED不复制BLOB和CLOB;但是,它们的空间将在备用数据库中分配。
-------------------------- -----------------------
I am trying to determine whether LOB''s are replciated using HADR. The
following documentation from the on-line manuals
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infoce...help/index.jsp suggest that
LOB''s are not replicated on HADR:
------------------------------------------------ ... - NOT LOGGED BLOBs and CLOBs are not replicated; however, the space for them will
be allocated on the standby database."
-------------------------------------------------



我被告知此文档错误将在下次刷新时更正。


干杯

Serge


-

Serge Rielau >
DB2 SQL编译器开发

IBM多伦多实验室


I''m told this doc error will be corrected in the next refresh.

Cheers
Serge

--
Serge Rielau
DB2 SQL Compiler Development
IBM Toronto Lab


你能具体告诉我什么是文档错误吗?


这是否意味着HADR将重新标记LOB'?

Can you tell me specifically what the doc error is?

Does that mean that HADR will replciate LOB''s?




当前文档在未记录的项目中对LOB进行分类是不正确的。
不正确。有些LOB被记录,有些则不然。记录的LOB是由HADR复制的好b $ b,未记录的LOB不是。


问候,

- Steve P.

--------------------------

Steve Pearson

DB2 UDB for LUW Development,Portland,OR,USA


The current documentation categorizing LOBs among non-logged items is
incorrect. Some LOBs are logged and some aren''t. Logged LOBs are
replicated just fine by HADR, non-logged LOBs are not.

Regards,
- Steve P.
--------------------------
Steve Pearson
DB2 UDB for LUW Development, Portland, OR, USA