更新时间:2023-12-03 18:42:10
我会换用Thread.CurrentPrincipal中一类叫然后提取接口。这种方法可以让我通过我的虚拟实现,作为一个依赖
另一种方法是准备这样的静态类:
公共静态类ApplicationPrincipal
{
私有静态Func键<&的IPrincipal GT; _current =()=> Thread.CurrentPrincipal中;
公共静态的IPrincipal当前
{
{返回_current(); }
}
公共静态无效SwitchCurrentPrincipal(Func键<&的IPrincipal GT;主)
{
_current =本金;
}
}
然后,你必须使用ApplicationPrincipal。当前在你的仓库,而不是直接调用。在测试中,你将能够通过调用ApplicationPrincipal.SwitchCurrentPrincipal切换默认的逻辑(()=> myPrincipal)。
编辑:
我会改变:
公共BOOL IsUserAuthenticated
{
{返回((UserPrincipal)校长).Identity.IsAuthenticated; }
}
使用:
公共BOOL IsUserAuthenticated
{
{返回ApplicationPrincipal.Current.Identity.IsAuthenticated; }
}
然后在安排的测试,我会改变默认的IPrincipal与部分:
VAR principalMock =新UserPrincipal(isAuthenticated:真);
ApplicationPrincipal.SwitchCurrentPrincipal(()=> principalMock);
我假设你能以某种方式重载IsAuthenticated的UserPrincipal对象的值。
I am trying to perform a unit test of an n-tier application, service layer, repository layer and web api controllers. My repositories are checking the Thread.CurrentPrincipal object to get the current user. This is where I have a problem, when I create the implementation class that inherits from IPrincipal it does allow me to set the IsUserAuthenticated. Is there a way to simulate this for my unit tests. I would like to set the Thread.CurrentPrincipal to my implementation object. How would I simulate a user in this way?
In my RepositoryBase code, I call the following to determine if user is authenticated:
public bool IsUserAuthenticated
{
get { return ((UserPrincipal)Principal).Identity.IsAuthenticated; }
}
The actual test looks something like:
Contract.Requires<UserAccessException>(IsUserAuthenticated, "Illegal Access.");
I am pulling IsUserAuthenticated from the UserPrincipal below:
namespace HeyLetsTrain.Toolkit.Helper.Authentication
{
public class UserPrincipal : IPrincipal
{
IIdentity _identity;
string[] _role;
string _emailAddress;
public UserPrincipal(string name, string[] role)
{
if (role != null)
{
_role = new string[role.Length];
_role.CopyTo(role, 0);
Array.Sort(_role);
}
_identity = new GenericIdentity(name);
}
public IIdentity Identity
{
get { return _identity; }
}
public string EmailAddress
{
get { return _emailAddress; }
set { this._emailAddress = value; }
}
public bool IsInRole(string role)
{
return Array.BinarySearch(_role, role) >= 0 ? true : false;
}
public bool IsInAllRoles( params string [] roles )
{
foreach (string searchrole in roles )
{
if (Array.BinarySearch(_role, searchrole) < 0 )
return false;
}
return true;
}
public bool IsInAnyRoles( params string [] roles )
{
foreach (string searchrole in roles )
{
if (Array.BinarySearch(_role, searchrole ) > 0 )
return true;
}
return false;
}
}
}
I would wrap Thread.CurrentPrincipal call with a class and then extract the interface. This approach would allow me to pass my dummy implementation as a dependency.
Another approach is to prepare static class like this:
public static class ApplicationPrincipal
{
private static Func<IPrincipal> _current = () => Thread.CurrentPrincipal;
public static IPrincipal Current
{
get { return _current(); }
}
public static void SwitchCurrentPrincipal(Func<IPrincipal> principal)
{
_current = principal;
}
}
Then you have to use ApplicationPrincipal.Current in your repositories instead of direct call. In your tests you will be able to switch default logic by calling ApplicationPrincipal.SwitchCurrentPrincipal(() => myPrincipal).
Edit:
I would change:
public bool IsUserAuthenticated
{
get { return ((UserPrincipal)Principal).Identity.IsAuthenticated; }
}
With:
public bool IsUserAuthenticated
{
get { return ApplicationPrincipal.Current.Identity.IsAuthenticated; }
}
And then in arrange section of the test I would change default IPrincipal with:
var principalMock = new UserPrincipal(isAuthenticated: true);
ApplicationPrincipal.SwitchCurrentPrincipal(() => principalMock);
I assume you can somehow overload the value of IsAuthenticated in UserPrincipal object.