其他正确回答的问题是，这不可能预先解决。但是如果没有小帮手，您就可以很接近

Other answered correctly said this is not possible upfront. But with little helpers, you can get pretty close

template<typename T, std::size_T N, std::size_t ...Ns>
std::array<T, N> make_array_impl(
    std::initializer_list<T> t,
    std::index_sequence<Ns...>) 
{
    return std::array<T, N>{ *(t.begin() + Ns) ... };
}

template<typename T, std::size_t N>
std::array<T, N> make_array(std::initializer_list<T> t) {
    if(N > t.size())
       throw std::out_of_range("that's crazy!");
    return make_array_impl<T, N>(t, std::make_index_sequence<N>());
}

如果您愿意接受更多的解决方法，可以将其放在一个类中可以在传递括号初始化列表的情况下捕获静态已知的长度违规。但请注意，大多数阅读此代码的人都会在前台

If you are open to more work arounds, you can put this into a class to catch statically-known length violations for the cases where you pass a braced init list. But be warned that most people who read this code will head-desk

template<typename T, std::size_t N>
struct ArrayInitializer {
    template<typename U> struct id { using type = U; };
    std::array<T, N> t;

    template<typename U = std::initializer_list<T>>
    ArrayInitializer(typename id<U>::type z) 
        :ArrayInitializer(z, std::make_index_sequence<N>())
    { 
        if(N > z.size())
            throw std::out_of_range("that's crazy!");
    }

    template<typename ...U>
    ArrayInitializer(U &&... u)
       :t{ std::forward<U>(u)... }
    { }

private:
    template<std::size_t ...Ns>
    ArrayInitializer(std::initializer_list<T>& t,
                     std::index_sequence<Ns...>)
       :t{ *(t.begin() + Ns) ... }
    { }
};

template<typename T, std::size_t N>
std::array<T, N> f(ArrayInitializer<T, N> ai) {
    return std::move(ai.t);
}

int main() {
   f<int, 5>({1, 2, 3, 4, 5});  // OK 
   f<int, 5>({1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6});  // "too many initializers for array<int, 5>"

   std::initializer_list<int> il{1, 2, 3, 4, 5};
   f<int, 5>(il); // ok
}

请注意，答案和总部情况仅检查 initializer_list 情况下是否提供了太多的初始化元素，然后出错。如果您为 initializer_list 案例提供了太多内容，则尾随元素将被忽略。

Note that both the non-static case at the top of the answer and the "head-desk" case do only check whether you provide too few initializing elements, and errors out then, for the initializer_list case. If you provide too many for the initializer_list case, the trailing elements are just ignored.