tldr-again; CoffeeScript的作者只是告诉我我是对的：不要使用 _i 。

tldr-again; The author of CoffeeScript just told me I'm right: Don't use _i.

14:29 <jashkenas> You shouldn't use internal variables. 
...
14:42 <meagar> I was hoping something more deeply involved in the language would be able to put some authority behind that opinion 
14:43 <meagar> ... I was basically hoping for an authoritative "don't do that" 
14:44 <jashkenas> you just got it ;) 
14:44 <jashkenas> for item, index in list -- there's your reference to the index. 

---

tldr;这是最多 无文档的功能，其功能等同于记录功能存在。

---

tldr; This is at best an undocumented feature for which a functionally equivalent documented feature exists. As such, it should not be used.

您对less typing的论点很可疑，因此不应该使用 比较：

Your argument of "less typing" is highly dubious; compare:

for x in [1, 2, 3] when _i % 2 == 0
  console.log "#{_i} -> #{x}"

for x,i in [1, 2, 3] when i % 2 == 0
  console.log "#{i} -> #{x}"

---

---

功能，bug或NaN？

feature, bug, or NaN?

这些都没有;它是未定义的行为。您假设 _i 将是用于编译JavaScript中的迭代的变量。

None of these things; it's undefined behaviour. You are assuming that _i will be the variable used for iteration in the compiled JavaScript.

你绝对不应该使用 _i ，或者假设 _i 被定义。这是一个实现细节，他们可以随时更改它。如果你的循环嵌套在另一个循环中，它也不会 _i 它将 _j 或 _k 等。

You definitely shouldn't use _i, or assume _i will be defined. That's an implementation detail, and they're free to change it at any time. It's also won't be _i if your loop is nested in another loop; it will be _j or _k etc.

重要的是，您可以在不需要依赖底层实现的JavaSript变量的情况下做这件事情。如果你想循环一个索引，只需使用的值，键入数组：

Most importantly, you can do this exact thing without relying on the underlying implementation's JavaSript variables. If you want to loop with an index, just use for value,key in array:

array = ['a', 'b', 'c']

console.log(index) for item, index in array # 0, 1, 2

具体来说，在您的示例中：

Specifically, in your example:

feast = (cats) -> eat cat for cat, index in cats when index % 2 == 0