>在Win2k上执行相同的任务：下载wxPython-setup.exe，双击，完成。

> Same task on Win2k: download wxPython-setup.exe, double-click, done.

找我约。 1分钟。这让我很震惊。为什么Linux上的某些任务如此难以在Windows上如此简单？毕竟wxPython / Win和wxPython / Lin
是由同一个开发人员制作的。我的猜测：Linux上的软件部署基础设施需要改进。

Took me approx. 1 minute. This strikes me. Why are some tasks so hard
on Linux and so easy on Windows? After all wxPython/Win and wxPython/Lin
are made by the same developers. My guess: the software deployment
infrastructure on Linux needs to be improved.

在debian上，它是


apt-get install wxPython2.5.3

所以它显然取决于你的发行版。这是不幸的是

当然是真的...


我认为窗户安装更简单有几个原因：
>
- 在unix上，程序通常链接到

计算机上可用的库，因此缺少依赖项会导致安装失败。在Windows上，

安装程序会安装所有依赖项 - 并且可能会覆盖

系统dll（CorelDraw 7在1998年杀死了Exchange）

>
- 有更多商用的Windows安装程序 - 也许

，因为UNIX上的免费软件开发人员不太愿意为这些工具或管理员支付费用可以信任这样的系统更容易用配置等处理

。

- 各种硬件_and_软件运行的unix系统很多

更大，所以编译是唯一的方法，如果你不想支持b / b $ b $多种二进制文件（并且有可用于这些的硬件）。在窗户上，

你可以在家里编译并安装在工作中的大铁上。


所有的积分当然只是一个解释，没有任何借口 - 那里_could_

是更好的安装人员。正如我所展示的那样，在已经可用的部分，例如

for debian处理依赖关系通常要好得多，而且更容易使用
用于在线更新。我想我们必须等到一致的依赖性

检查等等 - 也许LSB可以帮助我们。


-

问候，


Diez B. Roggisch

On debian, it

apt-get install wxPython2.5.3

So it clearly depends on you distribution. That this is unfortunate is of
course true...

I think there are several reasons for windows having easier installation:

- on unix, progams usually are linked to libraries available on the
machine, so missing dependencies make the installation fail. On windows,
the installer installs all the dependencies - and possibly overwrites
system dlls (CorelDraw 7 killed Exchange by that, back in 1998)

- there is more commercially available installers for windows - maybe
because free software developers on UNIXes are less keen to pay for such
tools, or the admins of such systems can be trusted to be more apt dealing
with configure and the like.

- the variety of hardware _and_ software unix systems run on is much
larger, so compiling is the only way to go if you don''t want to support a
plethorea of binaries (and have hardware available for these). On windows,
you can compile at home and install it on the big iron at work.

All the points are of course only an explanation, no excuse - there _could_
be better installers. As I showed, in parts that''s already available, e.g.
for debian which handles dependencies usually much better and is easier to
use for online updates. I think we have to wait until consistent dependency
checking and so on are established - maybe LSB helps us there.

--
Regards,

Diez B. Roggisch

|在debian上，它是
|

| apt-get install wxPython2.5.3

|

|所以这显然取决于你的发行。

|

|这是不幸的当然是真的......

| ....


Diez ....


wxPython2.5.3的软件包目前可用

对于Debian Sid /不稳定但不适合Sarge /测试......


-

Cousin Stanley

人类

亚利桑那州凤凰城

| On debian, it
|
| apt-get install wxPython2.5.3
|
| So it clearly depends on you distribution.
|
| That this is unfortunate is of course true...
| ....

Diez ....

The package for wxPython2.5.3 currently is available
for Debian Sid/unstable but not for Sarge/testing ....

--
Cousin Stanley
Human Being
Phoenix, Arizona

Diez B. Roggisch schrieb：

Diez B. Roggisch schrieb:

同样的任务Win2k：下载wxPython-setup.exe，双击，完成。
接近我。 1分钟。这让我很震惊。为什么Linux上的某些任务如此难以在Windows上如此简单？毕竟wxPython / Win和wxPython / Lin
是由同一个开发人员制作的。我的猜测：Linux上的软件部署基础设施需要改进。

关于debian，它是apt-get install wxPython2.5.3

Same task on Win2k: download wxPython-setup.exe, double-click, done.
Took me approx. 1 minute. This strikes me. Why are some tasks so hard
on Linux and so easy on Windows? After all wxPython/Win and wxPython/Lin
are made by the same developers. My guess: the software deployment
infrastructure on Linux needs to be improved.

On debian, it

apt-get install wxPython2.5.3

我听过Debian'的安装系统的赞美，但是对于最新版本，Debian非常保守。有一些软件包（例如Python，
PostgreSQL，Subversion）我想要有最新的版本。

我不想太紧绑定到

Linux发行版的更新周期。

所有这些点当然只是一个解释，没有任何借口 - 那里_could_
是更好的安装程序。正如我所展示的那样，已经可用的部分，例如，对于处理依赖关系的debian来说，通常要好得多，并且更容易用于在线更新。我认为我们必须等到一致的依赖性检查等等 - 也许LSB可以帮助我们。

I have heard praises of Debian''s install system but Debian is quite
conservative with latest versions. There are some packages (e.g. Python,
PostgreSQL, Subversion) where I''d like to have the latest versions.
I don''t want to be too tightly bound to the update cycles of the
Linux distribution.
All the points are of course only an explanation, no excuse - there _could_
be better installers. As I showed, in parts that''s already available, e.g.
for debian which handles dependencies usually much better and is easier to
use for online updates. I think we have to wait until consistent dependency
checking and so on are established - maybe LSB helps us there.

如果有一个共同的规范如何查询和更改

系统和应用程序的配置数据这将是

真有帮助。


-

--------------------------------------------- ----------------------

Peter Maas，M + R Infosysteme，D-52070 Aachen，电话+ 49-241-93878 -0

电子邮件''cGV0ZXIubWFhc0BtcGx1c3IuZGU = \ n''。decode（''base64''）

----------- -------------------------------------------------- ------

If there would be a common specification how to query and change
configuration data of the system and applications this would be
really helpful.

--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Maas, M+R Infosysteme, D-52070 Aachen, Tel +49-241-93878-0
E-mail ''cGV0ZXIubWFhc0BtcGx1c3IuZGU=\n''.decode(''base64'')
-------------------------------------------------------------------