亲爱的马里奥斯，


总是apache比IIS好。


要使用i windows，请下载apache二进制文件。
>
或者从
下载XAMPP http：// www .apachefriends.org / zh / xampp.html


它有内置的apache，mysql，php，perl和其他插件。


非常好。


问候，

T.Shrinivasan。

Dear Marios,

Always apache is better than IIS.

To use i windows, download apache binaries.

Or download XAMPP from
http://www.apachefriends.org/en/xampp.html

It has inbuild apache, mysql, php, perl and other addons.

really nice.

regards,
T.Shrinivasan.

另一个对apache的投票......我正在运行几个内联网服务器

，apache 2.0.55作为Windows 2003上的一项服务，到目前为止我还没有

零问题（大约1年，Windows上的Apache升级

在我的情况下很简单）。非常满意使用PHP5和

MySQL5。

Another vote for apache here...I am running a couple intranet servers
with apache 2.0.55 as a service on Windows 2003, and thus far I there
have been zero problems (around 1 year, and Apache upgrades on Windows
were simple in my case). Very happy with performance using PHP5 and
MySQL5 as well.

mariosp写道：

mariosp wrote:

I想要在Windows 2003中请求有关Apache的安装和配置的更多信息，我想知道哪个是Windows 2003 Server中更好的IIS或apache

I would like to request more information for the installation and
configuration of Apache in windows 2003 and I would like to know which
is better IIS or apache in Windows 2003 Server

我建议由于IIS是专门为Windows编写的，并且能够充分利用内幕知识，因此IIS会更快。

然而，这是纯粹的猜想。


虽然，我愿意打赌其他两个回复也不是基于事实

; o ）


它可能值得进行基准测试，虽然我很确定

的速度差异是如此之小以至于不会对一个值得被打扰的水平

。花时间设计更好的代码将会提高性能远远超过IIS

和Apache之间的差异。

I''d suggest that since IIS is written exclusively for Windows, and is
able to take advantage of insider knowledge, IIS would be faster.
However that is pure conjecture.

Although, I''m willing to bet the other two replies aren''t based on fact
either ;o)

It''s perhaps worth benchmarking, although I''m fairly certain that the
speed difference will be so slight as to not effect anything to a level
that is worth being bothered about. Spending that time designing better
code will improve performance far more than the difference between IIS
and Apache.

>