两者都迫使您使用比纯JS更声明性/功能性的编程样式。 ClopureScript更像是JS的替代品，而Elm更像是整个Web开发堆栈（HTML / CSS / JS）的替代品。

Both force you to use a more declarative/functional programming style than pure JS. ClojureScript is more like a JS replacement, whereas Elm is more like a replacement for the entire web development stack (HTML/CSS/JS).

其他区别：

• Elm语法更类似于Haskell


• ClojureScript更接近传统的Lisp语法


• Elm针对时变值（Elm中的信号）进行了高度优化


• ClojureScript更成熟，您可以找到一些不错的开发工具（Eclipse插件，LightTable等。）


• Elm是静态类型的，ClojureScript是动态类型的

• Elm syntax is much more Haskell-like
• ClojureScript is much closer to traditional Lisp syntax
• Elm is highly optimized for time-varying values ("signals" in Elm)
• ClojureScript is more mature and you can find some sweet development tools for it (Eclipse plug-ins, LightTable, etc.)
• Elm is statically typed, ClojureScript is dynamically typed

希望这会有所帮助。我仍在学习这两种语言，所以我可能错过了一些东西。

Hope this helps. I'm still learning both of these languages so I may have missed something.