要解决此问题，我创建了两个新的Xcode方案.一个名为"XXX设备"，不包括malloc保护；第二个是"XXX Simulator"，并且确实包含malloc防护.

To work around, I created two new Xcode schemes. One is named 'XXX Device' and does not include the malloc guards; the second is 'XXX Simulator' and does include the malloc guards.

为设备/模拟器目的添加方案是有问题的(http://www.cocoabuilder.com/archive/xcode/303307-why-does-xcode-create-nonsensical-destinations-in-every-scheme.html) .显然，Dave Duncan并未遇到Xcode无法正确执行某些操作(或他未使用诸如malloc防护之类的工具)的问题.

Adding a scheme for device/simulator purposes is questionable (http://www.cocoabuilder.com/archive/xcode/303307-why-does-xcode-create-nonsensical-destinations-in-every-scheme.html). Apparently, Dave Duncan has not encountered an issue where Xcode does not do something correctly (or he does not use tools such as malloc guards).

这是库比蒂诺(Cupertino)软件垃圾的后代.对苹果及其糟糕的质量检查部门+1，以便让另一个错误免费发布.

This reeks of Cupertino software junk. +1 to Apple and its crappy QA department (if it exists) which let another bug fly free.