资源被解释为脚本但以MIME类型text / html传输。

Resource interpreted as script but transferred with MIME type text/html.

从技术上讲，这不是错误，而是通知/警告，不应特别引起任何问题;如果有的话，这是一个很好的迹象，有些浏览器可能会选择忽略这样的回复。

Technically that's not an error but a notice / warning and should not cause any issues in particular; if anything it's a good indication that some browsers may choose to ignore such a response.

正确的 Content-Type 根据 RFC ，JavaScript的响应标头是：

The correct Content-Type response header for JavaScript according to the RFC is:

Content-Type: application/javascript

以前的 text / javascript 和 application / x-javascript 的值分别已过时或已弃用;那说，IE< = 8只接受前者，所以在对你的文件进行任何修改时要小心。

Previous values of text/javascript and application/x-javascript are either obsolete or deprecated respectively; that said, IE <= 8 will only accept the former so be careful when making any changes to your documents.